A sale only happens when both sides agree that it happens. The MacOS X retail package has a note "sale is subject to acceptance of the license". Yet if the store you're supposed to return it to says "all sales final" then wouldn't apple be on the hook for handling refunds of the "refused to consent to the EULA" variety If it's presented after purchase, then you are not obliged to agree to it. I'm curious if apple even has the legal right to restrict installation to apple hardware. But then nobody outside of Apple can know for sure.īut since Apple never officially supported any none Apple hardware it seems funny that people are saying that they officially stopped supporting Atom netbooks. What I am saying that I can not say why it happened or what exactly did happen. They may have done it intentionally or it could just be a side effect that they didn't test for and frankly don't need to test for. You think that they did this to be a pain but to be honest if they where going to do this then why not break all hackintoshs and not just netbooks? It is possible that their is a bug that only happens on the Atom and Apple didn't test for it because they do not support the Atom or plan on supporting the Atom with this OS. At the OS level the Atom is not 100% identical with the Core2Duo, P4, i7, or AMD line. We used Borland Pascal and there was an issue with the CRT.o unit that blew up on the Intel PII. ![]() Way back when the PII came out our application blew up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |